Key takeaways
Crash talk is back not because Silicon Valley is “collapsing,” but because demand is softer (high payments + affordability stress) while prices are still being supported by limited single-family inventory.
Locally, weakening demand shows up first in the “quiet” indicators: longer days on market, more price reductions, more selective buyers, and less forgiveness for overpricing—even when headline prices look steady.
The biggest risk isn’t demand vanishing overnight—it’s supply expanding faster than buyers can absorb it. If inventory rises as mortgage lock-in fades (and more owners decide to move), a 10–20% correction becomes plausible, which can materially change retirement plans for equity-dependent homeowners.
Summary: Demand is weaker, affordability is the constraint, and supply is the swing factor—so if selling is on your horizon anyway, planning beats guessing (especially if inventory starts to build).
For as long as most homeowners can remember, there has always been speculation about when the real estate market will “finally crash.” And to be fair, that speculation hasn’t always been wrong. Many people vividly remember what happened between 2008 and 2011, when home values fell sharply, millions of homeowners lost their homes to foreclosure, and confidence evaporated almost overnight. That experience left a lasting imprint, especially on homeowners who were already adults at the time.
Because of that history, people naturally look for signs that something similar could happen again. Not necessarily another catastrophe of the same magnitude, but at least a meaningful downturn. Every wobble in demand, every rise in inventory, every economic headline gets filtered through that memory. The question today isn’t whether people are nervous — they clearly are — but whether the current market conditions justify that concern.
What makes the current moment confusing is that some of the warning signs are clearly present, while others are not. Demand has weakened. Affordability is stretched. Sales volume is down. Yet prices, particularly in supply-constrained areas like the Bay Area, have remained relatively steady. That disconnect is what makes this market hard to read — and why planning matters more than guessing.
Weakened Demand Is Real — And It’s Already Showing Up Nationally
Across the country, there are already places where weakened demand has translated into real price declines. This isn’t theoretical. It’s happening now, particularly in markets that saw the largest pandemic-era runups and where inventory has surged. Parts of Texas, Florida, Arizona, and the Mountain West have experienced meaningful softening as new construction piled up and buyers pulled back. In cities like Austin, Phoenix, Tampa, and Boise, prices are down from peak levels, sometimes by double digits, as higher mortgage rates collided with rapid inventory growth.
Those markets share a few common traits. They built aggressively. They attracted large numbers of rate-sensitive buyers. And they don’t have the same long-term supply constraints that coastal California does. When demand weakened, there was nothing structural holding prices up. Inventory rose quickly, sellers competed with each other, and prices adjusted downward.
The Bay Area, and Silicon Valley in particular, operates under different constraints, which is why price declines here tend to show up later and more unevenly. But that doesn’t mean the region is immune to weakened demand. It just means the effects appear in subtler ways before they show up in headline prices.
Sell As-Is. Sell Easy. Sell Smart!
Where the Cracks Are Showing Locally: Condos and Affordability
Locally, the clearest weakness right now is in the condo market. Condos have been under pressure for several reasons, but affordability is the biggest one. Monthly payments on condos have risen sharply due to higher mortgage rates, higher HOA dues, rising insurance costs, and, in some cases, special assessments. Even when the purchase price looks “reasonable” compared to a single-family home, the all-in monthly cost often doesn’t pencil out for buyers.
In Santa Clara County, condo sales volumes remain well below pre-pandemic norms, and price growth has lagged single-family homes significantly. In some submarkets, condo prices are flat to down year-over-year, while single-family homes remain near peak levels. That divergence is a textbook example of affordability stress showing up where buyers have the least flexibility.
Single-family homes are holding up better, but even there, the cracks are visible. Sales are taking a little longer. Buyers are certainly more cautious. Price reductions are notably more common than they were a few years ago. The market is still functioning, but it is much less forgiving than in recent years gone by.
What the Broader Data Are Telling Us About Demand
When you step back and look at broader indicators of demand, the picture becomes clearer. Days on market are higher than they were during the pandemic boom. Total sales volume remains well below historical averages. The percentage of listings that experience price reductions has increased. More listings are expiring or being withdrawn when sellers don’t get the response they expected. And the ratio of sale price to list price has come down, even if it remains above 100% in many neighborhoods (and in Santa Clara County as a whole).
None of these signals scream “crash.” What they do signal is a market that has lost momentum. Buyers are still there, but they are selective. They negotiate harder. They walk away more easily. And they punish overpricing quickly.
Why Supply and Demand Still Rule Everything
All of this comes back to the same fundamental principle that governs real estate in every market, at every price point: supply and demand. Prices don’t rise or fall in isolation. They move based on the balance between how many people want to buy and how many people need or want to sell.
Right now, prices appear steady largely because supply remains constrained. Many homeowners are still reluctant to sell, and that scarcity continues to support values. But supply has never stayed constrained forever. It always expands eventually, even if it does so gradually.
Your Neighbor Sold their House too Cheap!
The Mortgage Lock-In Effect Is Quietly Fading
One of the reasons supply stayed so tight over the past few years was the so-called “mortgage lock-in” effect. Millions of homeowners refinanced or bought homes with mortgage rates in the 2.75% to 3.5% range. Selling meant giving up a loan that was effectively irreplaceable. That kept people in place, even when moving might otherwise have made sense.
What’s changing now is subtle but important. Over time, more homeowners now carry mortgages at rates above 6% than at those ultra-low pandemic rates. That means an increasing share of owners are no longer locked in by interest rates. They are already living in today’s rate environment. When those homeowners consider moving, the rate shock is much smaller.
That doesn’t mean supply will flood the market all at once. But it does mean that one of the most-cited forces suppressing supply is weakening. And when supply grows at the same time demand is already constrained by affordability, prices become vulnerable.
Why This Matters So Much for Longtime Bay Area Homeowners
This matters enormously for longtime Bay Area homeowners, particularly those who have lived in their homes for decades. Many of these homeowners are planning to use their equity to fund retirement, support lifestyle changes, help family members, or pay for future care. That equity is not theoretical. It is central to their financial security.
If supply were to increase meaningfully while demand remains weakened by high prices and mortgage rates, a decline of 10% to 20% in home values would not be trivial. For a home worth $2 million, that represents a loss of $200,000 to $400,000. That kind of swing can materially change retirement plans, especially for people who are counting on that equity as a safety net.
We’ve Seen How Fast Momentum Can Change
We don’t have to imagine how quickly sentiment can shift. We saw it just a year ago. The year began with a strong market, renewed optimism, and buyers returning after the previous slowdown. Then external shocks hit (yes, those lovely tariffs). The market seized up, from coast to coast. Buyers pulled back. Prices softened. It took about six months or more for confidence to return and activity to normalize.
That pattern matters because it shows how fragile momentum can be. Markets don’t need a full-blown recession to stall. They just need uncertainty. And uncertainty is abundant right now.
Ask homeowners who planned to wait until April to sell last year whether they wish they had listed in February instead, knowing what they know now. Many would say yes. Not because April is a bad month to sell (although March is often better), but because conditions changed faster than expected.
Downsizing Done Right
The Question Every Potential Seller Should Be Asking Right Now
That is the question sellers need to ask themselves today. If you knew that waiting another six months would cost you $200,000, would you still wait? If the answer is no, then the real question becomes why take that risk now, in a market that is increasingly unpredictable.
Seasonality still matters, but not in the simplistic way it’s often discussed. Spring is typically strong not because flowers bloom, but because demand temporarily outpaces supply. Buyers come back first. Sellers follow later. That early imbalance favors sellers.
Why Early Spring Still Favors Sellers
In practice, early spring — often sometime in early March — tends to be the sweet spot. That is when buyer urgency has returned, but inventory has not yet fully built up. By late spring, more sellers have entered the market, competition increases, and buyers gain leverage. Prices don’t necessarily fall, but negotiating power shifts.
In a market where demand is already stretched by affordability, that timing difference becomes more important, not less. Listing earlier doesn’t guarantee a better outcome, but it does reduce exposure to changing conditions.
None of this is meant to be alarmist. Silicon Valley does not appear to be on the brink of a 2008-style collapse. The structural differences are real. Supply constraints are real. Equity levels are high. Forced selling is limited.
But stability today does not eliminate risk tomorrow. The market is normalizing, and normalization means less margin for error. It means planning matters. It means timing matters. And it means homeowners who are thoughtful and proactive are better positioned than those who assume today’s conditions will hold indefinitely.
For homeowners in their 60s and beyond, this isn’t about trying to time the market perfectly. It’s about understanding the risks of waiting in an environment where affordability is already suppressing demand and where supply is more likely to grow than shrink over the coming years.
Does Waiting Six Months or a Year, or Two, Make Sense?
A lot of long-time Bay Area homeowners fall into the “maybe I’ll just wait for rates to drop” trap. That’s totally understandable, because, of course, lower rates can improve affordability and bring more buyers off the sidelines. But there’s no guarantee rates will be meaningfully lower in six months or a year. Inflation can re-accelerate, energy prices can spike, the Fed can hold steady longer than expected, and bond markets can push mortgage rates higher even without a Fed move. And most credible outlooks (from mainstream housing economists and lenders) aren’t calling for a quick return to the “5% with a 4-handle” world, let alone anything like the pandemic era.
Meanwhile, the bigger risk of waiting isn’t just that rates could actually increase: it’s supply. Prices in Silicon Valley don’t usually fall because demand vanishes; they soften when choices expand.
Here are a few more things that could cause supply to “mushroom” and tilt the market toward buyers:
A meaningful stock market pullback can reduce buyer urgency, while also prompting some owners to sell for liquidity or relocation. This might be especially noted in the upper end of the market. And while AI is touted as improving worker productivity, it also does pose a massive disruptive threat to employment over the coming years, with the potential to throw large numbers of workers (especially coders) out of work. Then there are insurance costs, or difficulty obtaining insurance, which could propel more long-time owners (many of whom are on fixed incomes) to put their homes up for sale in increasing numbers.
In short, there are any number of things that could contribute to a sustained and substantial increase in supply, which, in the face of lukewarm demand, could herald an extended period of significantly softer home prices throughout the region.
Conclusion
If you’ve read this far, here’s the punchline: you don’t need to believe in a “crash” to justify getting serious about your timing.
Silicon Valley real estate usually doesn’t break because buyers disappear. It softens when buyers get choices. And right now, the biggest risk to waiting isn’t just that rates might stay elevated over the long haul, it’s that the supply picture can change faster than most homeowners expect. If inventory expands meaningfully while affordability is still stretched, the market can shift from “name your price” to “well, we only need one buyer…” in a hurry… and that’s when sellers start giving back six figures without realizing it until it’s too late.
So here’s the call to action: don’t guess — run the numbers with your own home. If selling is even a maybe this spring or this year, the smart move is to map out two scenarios side-by-side: (1) list in the early spring window when buyers are back and competition is lighter, versus (2) wait six to twelve months and accept the risk that rates don’t improve but inventory does. I can show you what the market is doing right now in your zip code — days on market, price reductions, months of inventory, and the price band your home will compete in — and then build a simple plan that protects your downside while keeping your options open.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Silicon Valley real estate going to crash like 2008?
A 2008-style crash is possible in theory, but the setup today is different. In Silicon Valley, forced selling has historically been the ingredient that turns a slowdown into a true crash. Right now, many owners have substantial equity, underwriting has been tighter for years, and supply is still limited. That said, prices don’t need a “crash” to create real pain: a 10–20% correction can happen when inventory rises faster than buyer demand—especially when affordability is already strained.
What are the biggest warning signs to watch in Santa Clara County?
The most useful early signals are local, not national: months of inventory, the share of listings with price reductions, days on market, sale-to-list price ratio, and the number of listings that cancel or expire. When more homes sit, more sellers cut price, and sale-to-list trends down, that’s a real demand signal—even if median prices still look “fine.”
If mortgage rates drop, won’t that push prices up again?
Lower rates can improve affordability and bring buyers off the sidelines. But there’s no guarantee rates will drop meaningfully, and there’s also no guarantee that lower rates automatically lift prices if supply expands at the same time. In practice, the market responds to the balance: if rates dip but inventory mushrooms, sellers may still have to compete harder on price and terms.
Why does Silicon Valley stay expensive even when demand softens?
Silicon Valley behaves differently because of high incomes, strong long-term job demand, and persistent supply constraints (limited buildable land, low turnover, and slow housing production). When demand weakens, the first impact is often fewer sales and more negotiation—not immediate price drops. Prices usually move down when buyers get choices, meaning inventory rises and stays up.
What could cause inventory to “mushroom” and put pressure on prices?
Inventory can expand faster than people expect if multiple forces stack up at once: more homeowners deciding to list (job changes, retirement moves, downsizing), investors exiting, higher carrying costs (insurance and property expenses), a meaningful increase in new listings, or a shift in expectations where sellers accept that the market has changed. The key is duration—if higher inventory persists for months, pricing power shifts.
Does “weaker demand” mean fewer buyers, or just pickier buyers?
In Silicon Valley it’s often “pickier buyers” first: more contingencies, longer decision cycles, more requests for credits, and less tolerance for overpricing. You’ll see it in rising days on market, more price reductions, and fewer “blowout” multiple-offer outcomes except for homes that are turnkey, well-located, and priced correctly.
Should I sell this spring, or wait six months for lower rates?
Waiting for lower rates is a gamble because rates can stay flat or rise. The bigger practical risk is that inventory rises while you wait, which can increase competition and reduce leverage. Early spring often benefits sellers because buyers tend to show up before the full wave of new listings. The smarter approach is to plan around your timeline and risk tolerance, not a prediction about rates.
What’s the best time of year to sell a home in Silicon Valley?
In many years, early spring performs well because demand returns before supply fully ramps up. By late spring and early summer, more listings usually appear, giving buyers more choices. That doesn’t mean “later” can’t work—only that timing is about leverage. If you want the best odds of multiple offers, you generally want to list when buyer urgency is higher than available supply.
How big of a price drop should a homeowner realistically plan for?
Nobody can promise a number. The planning mindset I recommend is scenario-based: what would a 5%, 10%, or 15% shift mean for your retirement plan, move timing, or ability to help family? For a $2,000,000 home, a 10% change is $200,000—enough to matter. If your plans depend on a certain equity outcome, planning early gives you options.
Does this apply to every neighborhood the same way?
Not at all. Silicon Valley is a patchwork of micro-markets. Highly desirable school districts and prime neighborhoods tend to stay tighter longer, while homes with functional obsolescence, deferred maintenance, busy streets, or “tough layouts” often feel demand shifts earlier. That’s why local comps and neighborhood-level inventory matter more than countywide headlines.
As a 60+ homeowner, what should I do if I might sell in the next 12–24 months?
Treat it like a planning project, not a listing decision. Start by clarifying your “why” (downsizing, retirement, family support, care planning), then get a pricing opinion based on current comps, and map out a prep plan that matches your risk tolerance (sell as-is vs. selective improvements). If you decide to sell, the goal is to be ready to move when the market is on your side—not scrambling after conditions shift.
What’s the biggest mistake sellers make in a normalizing market?
Overpricing based on last year’s peak psychology. In a normalizing market, buyers punish “hope pricing” quickly. The best outcomes usually come from correct pricing, strong presentation, and a launch strategy that creates urgency early—before the listing goes stale and negotiation power shifts.
How can I get a real answer for my specific neighborhood and home?
The fastest way is to look at neighborhood-level inventory, recent comparable sales, and the current “competing listings” that your home would be fighting against. If you want, I can run a quick, local analysis for your exact zip code and home type and show you where leverage is shifting (or
holding) right now.
Time to talk to a REALTOR?
Senior Friendly Homes in Silicon Valley South
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
