I guess it didn’t work out so well – his Soquel home is now back on the market – for $829,000, or about $79,000 more than it was on for sale about a month ago. Zoinks – swap that blue light for a red one – hold on, kids!
In a market like this, I can tell you one thing – increasing your asking price when your property hasn’t sold is not a winning strategy. The blue light special, that was a clever marketing gimmick, but it didn’t sell the house.
It should have been a good lesson, though – even at $749,997 the home is, apparently, over-priced in today’s market. The median price is now down to $475,000 in Santa Cruz county. Of course, this home is in Soquel, which is considerably more expensive, but the median there is only $610,000 (although the average is $843,000).
This time around, rather than trying to catch the buyer’s eye with a lowered price, the seller is trying to catch the Realtor’s eye – with a juicy 4% commission to the buyer’s real estate agent. That’s a healthy $33,160 the buyer’s agent would get to share with his broker and the tax man. A strong incentive, to be sure – but of course, we Realtors are duty bound to hold our clients’ interests above our own, and persuading your client to over-pay on a real estate purchase in exchange for a healthy commission seems like a breach of fiduciary responsibility to me.
Not that a licensed Real Estate agent would ever put his own financial interests over the best interests of his client. Of course not. That 4% commission just helps to bring about a few extra showings, by Realtors who think, hmm, maybe my client won’t really like this place, but since it’s paying a bigger commission, maybe it’s worth a shot.
If we extend that logic a bit further, it means that all these sellers who are offering just 2.5% or 3% to the buyer’s agent are missing out, leaving tens of thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands, of dollars on the table – they should really be offering 5%, or 8% – or more! – to the buyer’s agent; after all, that’s a lot cheaper than lowering the asking price of the home by 12%, which is what the market is telling them they need to do.
Why has nobody thought of this yet?
Have a good weekend everyone!
- Stop the Madness! Just say NO on AB 1482 September 9, 2019
- 2019 Mid-Year Real Estate Update for Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, and Monterey July 11, 2019
- Silicon Valley Real Estate Prices Drop Sharply in Q1 2019 April 17, 2019
- Senator Scott Wiener Talks SB50 April 10, 2019
- Selling a Home in 2019 vs. 2020 January 27, 2019
Top Posts & Pages
- The Anchoring Effect and Asking Price in Real Estate
- 2019 Mid-Year Real Estate Update for Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, and Monterey
- The Endowment Effect in Real Estate
- Property Tax Rates for Santa Cruz Real Estate
- Just Cause Evictions in Santa Cruz
- The 7-10 Year Real Estate Cycle
- Selling a Home in 2019 vs. 2020
- California 2019 Real Estate Forecast
- The Santa Cruz Housing Crisis